Submission
1 min read
NIST RFI: Security Considerations for AI Agents
Listen to this article
Table of Contents
Evaluating anti-scheming training
Apollo Research submitted a comment to the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) Request for Information (RFI) seeking information and insights on practices and methodologies for measuring and improving the secure development and deployment of AI agent systems (NIST-2025-0035).
In our submission, we shared Apollo Research’s perspective on the detection, mitigation, and monitoring of dangerous capabilities in agentic frontier AI systems, and offered a lens to understand why, compared to traditional software systems, agentic AI systems could pose a range of novel threats, potentially leading to loss of control.
Building on these considerations, we recommended:
- Accelerating the science of scheming and the science of misalignment evaluations more broadly, including by:
- Developing methods and technical solutions that address the threat vector of evaluation awareness in agentic frontier AI systems.
- Establishing best practices for external evaluations, such as enabling external evaluators with sufficient time and access to design, test, and perform appropriate and rigorous evaluations.
- Accelerating AI control, focusing specifically on the potential of AI monitoring practices, given their operational feasibility and plausibly large security rewards.
- Accelerating the understanding of high-stakes deployment contexts, where the combination of capabilities, affordances, and permissions increases the threat of loss of control. These deployment contexts include AI R&D, defense, and other critical infrastructure sectors. In this respect, we recommended:
- Accelerating the field’s understanding of the affordances and permissions that agentic frontier AI systems could be given access to in high-stakes deployment contexts, with the goal of better designing loss of control threat models and risk scenarios, and therefore achieving stronger government preparedness.
- Addressing the specific threats that could arise from the internal deployment of agentic frontier AI systems, and specifically from the automation of AI R&D pipelines.
Our comment to NIST’s RFI is available at this link. For additional questions and comments, please contact governance@apolloresearch.ai.
Share this article
oUR FINDINGS
More papers
June 17, 2026
A Loss of Control Threat Map for AI Research and Development
We created a threat map that traces pathways from AI use in AI R&D automation towards loss of control outcomes.
Blog
October 4, 2023
The UK AI Safety Summit: Our Recommendations
Apollo Research aims to understand and detect the ability of advanced AI models to evade standard safety evaluations, exhibit strategic deception and pursue misaligned goals.
Blog
May 20, 2026
The Need for Deeper, White-Box Access to Maintain State of the Art Evaluations for Loss of Control Threats
Evaluation awareness can increase loss of control threats and undermine security assessments. Evaluators need deeper, white-box access to maintain state-of-the-art evaluations.
Blog
October 11, 2023
Recommendations For The Next Stages Of The Frontier AI Taskforce
We recently composed and shared two policy recommendations with the Frontier AI Taskforce, in light of their mission to “ensure the UK’s capability in this rapidly developing area is built with safety and reliability at its core”. Our recommendations address the role of the Taskforce as a potential future (1) Regulator for AI Safety, and encourage the Taskforce to (2) Focus on National Security and Systemic Risk.
Blog